Picture the letter K. One stroke shoots upward sharply, the other drops downward.. This visual metaphor perfectly captures today’s economy, where recovery has split into two juxtaposed trajectories.
In the US, the top 10% earners bracket accounts for about half of all consumer spending. Simultaneously, middle-income households are consistently reporting that their financial situations are deteriorating. This bifurcation isn’t a temporary post-pandemic anomaly – it is becoming one of the defining features of 2025 and beyond.
A K-shaped economy describes an uneven economic recovery where different income cohorts and sectors recover at vastly different rates. Unlike the hoped-for V-shaped bounce, where everyone recovers together, a K-shaped dynamic permanently separates winners from losers. Higher-income households enjoy accumulated wealth advantages, investment gains on their wealth and wage growth that drives discretionary spending. Meanwhile, lower- and middle-income consumers face depleted savings, higher living costs and mounting debt burdens. This is particularly the case for younger, asset-poor generations managing student loan payments and credit card reliance.
Winners and losers
For investors, this dynamic may create an opportunity – but only for those skilled enough to identify true beneficiaries. The K-shaped economy doesn’t just split sectors; it fundamentally alters pricing power dynamics. Consensus today states that market winners emerge from two distinct categories.
First are genuine high-end goods and premium service providers – think LVMH-style players where customers are wealthy enough that inflation barely registers. These companies can mitigate inflation through price increases while their clientele continue to finance consumption through equity portfolios and real estate appreciation.
Second are aggressive discounters like Costco or Dollar General – firms whose entire value proposition is offering low prices. As lower- and middle-income households trade down the cost curve, these retailers capture that necessary traffic.
The middle looks likely to be where the losers will be. Mass-market cosmetics companies for example face a likely squeeze: they cannot raise prices to luxury levels (their customers are precisely those middle-income households cutting back), yet they cannot compete on cost without dragging margins down and incurring brand damage. The negative implication extends further. Companies dependent on consistent middle-market volume, such as consumer durables manufacturers, mid-tier restaurants and home furnishings businesses, are all likely to face persistent margin pressure. These businesses face a 2026 where volumes likely decline, promotional activity will intensify, and returns on capital could well compress.
A fragile economy
Though the bifurcation of the consumer may bring stock-picking opportunities in 2026, we must acknowledge the risk embedded in this dynamic: the K-shaped economy is inherently fragile. It’s entirely dependent on the upper-income consumer’s wealth effects remaining intact. If equity markets were to correct meaningfully, home prices were to soften, or white-collar employment deteriorated, the consumption engine that’s been helping to carry the economy could suddenly stall. The concentration of spending power at the top means any adverse shock will hit disproportionately hard.
The K-shaped economy brings extra attention to the ability of stock pickers to pick companies with genuinely strong fundamentals. Investors may not be able to passively rely on market beta from passive index funds as they once could. They must identify which individual companies have real pricing power, or market access aligned with these K-shape dynamics, or face the prospect of owning poorly positioned businesses with deteriorating fundamentals.
The companies that thrive will be those that understood this dynamic early: specialised goods manufacturers which can maintain exclusivity, discount retailers which can absorb margin pressure and expand market share and, perhaps counterintuitively, certain mid-market players which can find a defensible niche rather than compete broadly. The companies that may stumble are those whose business models assume a return to inclusive growth patterns – that may never come.
At Laurium, we specialise in bottom-up fundamental stock picking. Fundamentals have always been important in picking long-term quality companies. Within the context of a K-shaped global economic recovery, however, finding global businesses with strong fundamentals and real pricing power might just be more important than ever.
Contact us today for more information
Laurium is an authorised financial services provider (FSP 34152)
Sign up to Currency’s weekly newsletters to receive your own bulletin of weekday news and weekend treats. Register here.
What a sensible article. Peter Miller