The four rules of investing (and why simple is so hard) 

If investing were purely about intelligence, most people would do very well. The core principles are not complicated. They fit on a single page. Yet many investors struggle to follow them, year after year, even when they know exactly what they “should” be doing.

The problem isn’t complexity. It’s behaviour.

Over decades of working with investors, advisers and institutions, I’ve found that almost all successful long-term investing comes back to four simple rules. They aren’t clever. They aren’t exciting. And that’s exactly why they work.

Rule one: build a safety buffer

Before you think about investing, you need a buffer. Cash you can rely on for day-to-day life and unexpected expenses.

This is partly about real safety. A buffer protects you from being forced to sell investments at the worst possible moment to fund spending or deal with shocks. But it’s also about emotional safety.

The best analogy comes from dangerous sports. Mountaineers take extraordinary risks, but they only do so because of the extensive preparation underneath: training, equipment, redundancy and contingency planning. The safety buffer is what enables risk-taking, not what prevents it.

Investing is no different. Without a buffer, every market fall feels existential. With one, volatility becomes tolerable. The buffer is the foundation that allows you to take risk elsewhere with confidence.

Rule two: put the rest to work

Once your buffer is in place, the next rule is surprisingly difficult: invest the rest.

A large part of the behaviour gap does not come from panic selling. It comes from never investing enough in the first place. Money sits in cash, often for years, because waiting feels prudent.

There has never been a single day in human history when it would not have been easy to find a good reason not to invest today. Wars, recessions, elections, pandemics, bubbles, crashes, valuations, geopolitics – the list is endless. And yet, viewed over standard investment horizons, almost all of these reasons turn out to have been inconsequential.

Markets reward participation far more reliably than precision. Imperfect investing is almost always better than non-investing.

This rule is not about bravado. It is about accepting that long-term progress comes from being invested, not from waiting for certainty that never arrives.

Rule three: diversify properly

Diversification is one of the few free lunches in finance, yet it is often misunderstood.

A portfolio concentrated into a handful of good stories is not the same thing as a portfolio diversified across good investments. Stories can be compelling, familiar and persuasive – but they tend to rise and fall together.

Proper diversification spreads risk across assets, regions, sectors and sources of return. Financially, this reduces the chance that any single shock derails your plan. Behaviourally, it smooths the journey, making it easier to stay invested when things go wrong somewhere.

Diversification often feels unsatisfying in good times. In difficult times, it is what keeps you in the game.

Rule four: leave it alone

This is the hardest rule of all.

Once you’ve built a buffer, invested the rest and diversified sensibly, the most valuable thing you can do is very little.

Markets do not reward activity. They reward patience. Constant checking, reacting to headlines and tinkering with portfolios usually increases anxiety and reduces returns.

That doesn’t mean never reviewing your portfolio. It means reviewing it deliberately: on a sensible schedule, with a clear purpose. Rebalancing, adjusting for major life changes and checking alignment with goals are all valid. Interfering because something feels uncomfortable rarely is.

Doing less is not laziness. It is discipline.

Why these rules are so hard to follow

None of these rules are intellectually demanding. What makes them hard is that each one clashes with a different, very human instinct.

Building a safety buffer feels like missed opportunity, even when it is what enables risk-taking elsewhere.

Investing feels risky, even when it is necessary for long-term progress.

Diversification feels unrewarding, even when it is protective.

Doing nothing feels negligent, even when it is the disciplined choice.

Each rule asks you to tolerate a different kind of short-term discomfort in exchange for long-term benefit. That trade-off – between immediate emotional comfort and durable outcomes – is the heart of behavioural investing.

Anxiety-adjusted returns

Traditional finance focuses on risk-adjusted returns: the highest returns per unit of risk.

Behavioural finance adds a more practical lens: anxiety-adjusted returns. Not the returns that look best on paper, but the best returns you are actually able to achieve, given the stress, discomfort and anxiety you can tolerate along the journey.

A strategy that maximises theoretical returns but keeps you awake at night is unlikely to be followed. A slightly less aggressive strategy that you can stick with often produces better real-world outcomes.

The four golden rules are not about maximising what is theoretically possible. They are about maximising what is behaviourally achievable.

Putting the rules together

Think of these rules as a system, not a checklist.

• The buffer provides real and emotional safety.
• Investing the rest captures long-term growth.
• Diversification reduces regret and panic.
• Leaving it alone preserves discipline.

Together, they create an investing approach that is simple, robust and sustainable for real people.

The takeaway

Good investing is not about brilliance. It is about avoiding unforced errors.

The four golden rules work not because they are sophisticated, but because they respect human limitations. They assume that fear, temptation and uncertainty will always be part of the journey, and they build around that reality.

Follow them well, and you won’t just invest better. You’ll invest more comfortably. And that comfort is often the difference between success and failure over the long run.

Greg B Davies leads behavioural innovation at fintech Oxford Risk, developing behavioural technology to enhance financial decision-making. He holds a PhD in behavioural decision theory from Cambridge University and is co-author of ‘Behavioral Investment Management’.

This article is part of an ongoing Currency News series on how behavioural finance can help investors make better decisions. If you’d like the full framework behind these ideas, including tools to align investing strategies with your financial personality, Greg’s CPD-accredited course, The Art of Behavioural Investing, created with 42Courses and Oxford Risk, walks through the approach step by step.

ALSO READ:

• Why smart people struggle with investing
• Know thyself: Your edge in smarter investing
• Healing your money trauma

_{Top image: Rawpixel/Currency collage.}